In a recent campaign speech, one of the two presidential nominees babbled incoherently about how “some people don’t eat bacon anymore” because of the “horrible energy” created by wind. “They want wind all over the place. When it doesn’t blow, we have a problem,” the candidate added.
The day before, the same candidate lost his train of thought while ranting about his opponent having “destroyed” San Francisco, bizarrely rambling about how much money he had lost and how he had been treated worse than Abraham Lincoln. At no point was there even a hint of a cogent thought.
In the midst of these ever-increasing moments of garbled nonsense, the New York Times published a piece parroting the candidate’s latest excuse for repeatedly “meandering” through his speeches and bouncing from topic to topic with no sense of rhyme or reason. ….more
